←back to thread

1321 points kwindla | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.409s | source
Show context
swagasaurus-rex ◴[] No.43794426[source]
Very exciting! Electric vehicles have the ability to be very simple, much simpler than an ICE.

Although electric can't be 100% analog, I miss the old days when a car has no software updates, no telemetry, no privacy issues, no mandatory subscription for features.

replies(4): >>43794543 #>>43794546 #>>43794634 #>>43794711 #
the__alchemist ◴[] No.43794543[source]
Don't want or need analog: Just don't enshittify the digital! CAN bus is a great system; don't IoT it or use dark patterns.
replies(2): >>43796071 #>>43796368 #
pnw ◴[] No.43796071[source]
I doubt CAN bus will be around that much longer, I know several EV manufacturers are actively phasing it out. Yes, it was revolutionary in it's time but it's a 40 year old standard that doesn't have enough bandwidth for the requirements of modern cars, and it was designed before security was even a thought. It's also unnecessarily complex wiring that adds weight to the car. Even the updated FD standard is only 8 mbps, so it's barely enough for video from a backup camera.
replies(1): >>43796257 #
1. the__alchemist ◴[] No.43796257[source]
It's a tool that's more than sufficient for most things. Video isn't one of those, and it's a 2-wire bus, so I don't see what the wiring concern is!
replies(1): >>43796401 #
2. pnw ◴[] No.43796401[source]
As I understand it, newer systems like LVCS and Ethernet use less wire and smaller connectors. Apparently it can save up to 30% of the weight in a wiring harness which would be about 100 lbs. There was a thread on it on HN not long ago.

Video for a backup camera is mandatory on new cars in the US and Europe, so it makes sense to use the same bus.