←back to thread

1336 points kwindla | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
taylodl ◴[] No.43794600[source]
I LOVE it! THIS is the kind of truck I'd be looking at to replace my 1998 Ford Ranger.

Here is what could be potential deal-breakers:

- Lack of a mobile app. Minimalist design is great, but I still want an app to manage charging and be alerted to any vehicle issues.

- Lack of good charge management and battery conditioning. Either that, or a cheap and easy to replace battery pack. I'd really like both!

- Comparable hauling and towing capacity to the 1998 Ford Ranger. Those numbers aren't exactly impressive, but I do use the truck as a truck, and I occasionally need the hauling capacity (weight).

- Bucket seats. I need a bench seat so I can take my wife and dog. Think weekend glamping trips. Picture 8 shows a bucket seat. It doesn't look like that would work.

If anyone from Slate is reading this, this is how I'm looking at this truck. FYI, I'll be comparing this to the Ford Maverick.

replies(31): >>43794692 #>>43794700 #>>43794763 #>>43794811 #>>43794831 #>>43794885 #>>43794914 #>>43794974 #>>43795270 #>>43795643 #>>43795656 #>>43795796 #>>43795943 #>>43796252 #>>43796714 #>>43796752 #>>43797342 #>>43797635 #>>43797641 #>>43797951 #>>43798033 #>>43798145 #>>43798246 #>>43798255 #>>43798738 #>>43799693 #>>43799714 #>>43799836 #>>43800852 #>>43801127 #>>43805436 #
hedgehog ◴[] No.43794831[source]
The Maverick apparently has poor build quality but I'm hoping Toyota comes up with a pickup using the same small footprint + bare bones + hybrid drivetrain formula.
replies(2): >>43795102 #>>43796719 #
quantified ◴[] No.43795102[source]
I read that as comparing it to one of Ford's cheap cars from the 70's. Which would be a low bar to meet.
replies(1): >>43795755 #
1. hedgehog ◴[] No.43795755{3}[source]
I just mean poor vs trucks from Honda or Toyota. I don't know if there's anything from a US brand that has comparable build quality and engineering these days.