←back to thread

1336 points kwindla | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.396s | source
Show context
danans ◴[] No.43794785[source]
From the related Ars article[1]:

> Rather than relying on a built-in infotainment system, you'll use your phone plugged into a USB outlet or a dedicated tablet inside the cabin for your entertainment and navigation needs.

How is a "dedicated tablet" different than an infotainment system, other than not having vehicle telematics and controls? Also, a regular tablet UX would be dangerous while driving, and typically they don't have their own mobile data connections.

1. https://arstechnica.com/cars/2025/04/amazon-backed-startup-w...

replies(4): >>43794876 #>>43794964 #>>43795067 #>>43795119 #
robertlagrant ◴[] No.43795119[source]
> Also, a regular tablet UX would be dangerous while driving

A passenger could operate it.

replies(1): >>43795287 #
danans ◴[] No.43795287[source]
A passenger can do that today with just a tablet in their lap. Why attach it to the dashboard?
replies(1): >>43795505 #
1. robertlagrant ◴[] No.43795505[source]
Oh, I maybe misread it - thought it meant you could plug your own tablet into the speaker system.
replies(1): >>43796778 #
2. danans ◴[] No.43796778[source]
You can do that in any car today. Nor is there a lack of devices available for physically attaching a regular tablet to your dashboard.

The question is whether a car maker should be encouraging or enabling a generic touch screen tablet to be installed on the dashboard versus an infotainment device with constrained functionality like AA/CP designed to minimize driver distraction.

I would be happy with a built-in screen that did nothing but AA/CP while the car was driving, and then reverted to a normal tablet interface when the car is parked.

Climate control, etc should be physical knobs and buttons. Anything critical to driving should be on or near the steering wheel.