←back to thread

601 points scalewithlee | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.31s | source
1. nicoledevillers ◴[] No.43795339[source]
it was a cf managed waf rule for a vulnerability that doesn't apply to us. we've disabled it.
replies(2): >>43798028 #>>43799362 #
2. SonOfLilit ◴[] No.43798028[source]
This comment deserves to be much higher, assuming this user speaks for Substack (no previous submissions or comments, but the comment implies it).
replies(1): >>43798700 #
3. nicoledevillers ◴[] No.43798700[source]
i don't speak for substack, but i do work there and changed the WAF rule :)
4. silverwind ◴[] No.43799362[source]
Why not review rules before applying them?