←back to thread

1329 points kwindla | 6 comments | | HN request time: 1.245s | source | bottom
Show context
dogline ◴[] No.43794427[source]
It's a $20k, street-legal, EV modding platform. Sounds like you can mount your own infotainment system. Just an electric motor, battery, and chassis, and the rest is up to you. Isn't this what we've been asking for?
replies(5): >>43794572 #>>43794693 #>>43796428 #>>43798341 #>>43798913 #
ryandrake ◴[] No.43794572[source]
Yea, it's pretty exciting. I'd like to see how much more they could strip out to reduce the price and still have a viable commercial product. I guess I'm living firmly in the past, but $20K still seems to be a high price for a car. Then again, I haven't bought a car new since the 90s, so I'm probably just an old fart who hasn't grokked what things cost today. I still remember the day when the base-model Corolla started costing more than $9999 and I thought the world was coming to an end.

EDIT: Yep, I'm just old. Another commenter linked to a "10 cheapest new cars" list and there seems to be a price floor of around $20K. No major manufacturer seems capable of making one cheaper!

1: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43794523

replies(7): >>43794613 #>>43794677 #>>43794705 #>>43794867 #>>43795308 #>>43796210 #>>43797193 #
connicpu ◴[] No.43794677[source]
According to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics[1], $9999 in 1995 is equivalent to $21,275.25 today, so it's a pretty spot on price for a barebones car.

[1]: https://www.bls.gov/data/inflation_calculator.htm

replies(1): >>43794751 #
patagonia ◴[] No.43794751[source]
Except, with advances in computational design and engineering, manufacturing automation, and moving to plastic for the body I would expect a reduction in price, in real terms. Not impressed.
replies(4): >>43794880 #>>43794908 #>>43794942 #>>43794973 #
kube-system ◴[] No.43794880[source]
> moving to plastic for the body

Some of those $10k cars in the 90s had more plastic in the bodies than cars today, e.g. Saturn S-series, where all body panels below the belt-line were plastic.

It isn't necessarily the cost savings one might expect though, because steel panels can also be load bearing and part of the crash structure, which is not really practical with plastic panels.

replies(3): >>43795168 #>>43795204 #>>43797222 #
1. dogline ◴[] No.43795204[source]
With plastic panels, that means they're replaceable. Possibly even swappable (custom 3D printing?). This just adds to the "modding platform" they could be marketing to.
replies(1): >>43795321 #
2. kube-system ◴[] No.43795321[source]
Steel panels can also be made to be replaceable. Plastic has to be because it can't be welded to the frame.
replies(1): >>43795958 #
3. riehwvfbk ◴[] No.43795958[source]
In fact, on modern cars many times these panels are replaced.

If you get a big enough dent in a door, a good body shop will offer to replace the outer skin instead of filling with bondo. They cut the weld on the inside of the door all the way around, take off the shell, and epoxy a new one on. The body shop owner told me that the epoxy is actually stronger than the factory weld.

replies(1): >>43796090 #
4. kube-system ◴[] No.43796090{3}[source]
Yes, bodywork is quite a mature discipline. I was presuming the parent commenter meant user-replaceable, i.e. bolted on.

> The body shop owner told me that the epoxy is actually stronger than the factory weld.

Often this is because the special high strength steels used in vehicles today depend on proper heat treating to attain their strength, and welding can compromise this. Many OEMs even specify panel bonding for repairing particular crash-critical parts of vehicles now because of this.

replies(1): >>43796407 #
5. potato3732842 ◴[] No.43796407{4}[source]
It's mostly because the factory welds are the result of someone running numbers until they find the bare minimum whereas the autobody guy would rather not risk it.
replies(1): >>43797271 #
6. kube-system ◴[] No.43797271{5}[source]
The OEMs have proper repair procedures that are the correct way to fix the vehicle, and if the autobody shop is reputable, they follow them. And the stated reason OEMs specify panel bonding instead of welding is:

1. because UHSS is sensitive to heat, and robots are much more accurate in how they heat than Jimmy with a tig torch, and they were programmed by a process engineer, where as Jimmy welds until 'it looks good'.

2. welding may compromise anti-corrosive treatments on the inside of inaccessible cavities, which can lead to corrosion issues

e.g. https://rts.i-car.com/crn-24.html

A crappy shop will certainly just weld panels in without any regard for materials engineering, but it results in a crappy repair.