←back to thread

Eurorack Knob Idea

(mitxela.com)
311 points po | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.298s | source
Show context
diggan ◴[] No.43793686[source]
Interesting idea for sure, but how is the feel of actually turning the knob? Seems to offer short to no resistance, which would make fast but precise movements pretty hard, something that is important for things like performances.

What would be a huge bonus point (but maybe unrealistic? I don't quite understand how the current implementation actually works) would be software-configurable resistance (physical, not electrical). I've spent a lot of time for my DIY modules to find the right knobs, or the right process to adjust the resistance of my existing knobs, being able to control that digitally could introduce a whole new level of fun.

replies(2): >>43793815 #>>43798268 #
scottapotamas ◴[] No.43793815[source]
You might enjoy https://github.com/scottbez1/smartknob

The complexity of this approach (ignoring the display and flair) unfortunately means you won’t see this used too often due to cost.

replies(4): >>43793879 #>>43794088 #>>43794111 #>>43806272 #
diggan ◴[] No.43793879[source]
That's so cool on so many levels, and I really enjoyed that indeed, now I have to fight the urge to try to build it myself, good thing it's weekend.

However, it does seem to miss the single most useful feature (for me) which is the resistance part. I understand there is a DC motor controlling the snap points and whatnot, but what I'd like is constant resistance I guess, to a configurable level, rather than snapping to specific points and such.

I don't think it would be possible to hack on top of the already made hardware, but didn't seem like it was already done in the software side of things, although I did skim through things so maybe I missed it.

replies(1): >>43793996 #
pakue ◴[] No.43793996[source]
Should be doable to add that. The BLDC needs to add a proportional (or any other function) force against the rotation direction until it reaches 0.
replies(1): >>43794043 #
diggan ◴[] No.43794043[source]
Sounds reasonable, wonder how that would actually feel in real life? As far as I understand, this would pass through digital parts, adding a little bit of (maybe noticeable) latency, but I wonder if the latency gets high enough for it to be a bit jarring that the resistance is dynamically changing as you apply torque.
replies(2): >>43795197 #>>43803275 #
1. scottapotamas ◴[] No.43795197[source]
This is all fairly normal in robotics, under a subset of (slightly overloaded naming sorry) “impedance control”