←back to thread

257 points delaugust | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.002s | source
Show context
motohagiography ◴[] No.43788457[source]
to me designers are the real architects of history, however, the cybertruck example as brash i disagree with for specific reasons.

it is a perfect example of what it does without any deference to other design languages. instead of po-mo symbolism, it really is just the sufficient metal and glass to do the thing. an essential truck is unsentimental working capital. its not a duck, its an undecorated shed.

i think the design will age very well because there's nothing to add to it.

replies(4): >>43789476 #>>43789836 #>>43789919 #>>43791419 #
codr7 ◴[] No.43789476[source]
It's hands down the ugliest thing I've ever seen.
replies(2): >>43789738 #>>43791765 #
1. BoingBoomTschak ◴[] No.43791765[source]
But at least it's not boring. I'd even call it audacious. Most of today's SUVs, you wouldn't be able to guess the brand/model if you took the badges away.
replies(2): >>43792117 #>>43796469 #
2. philipallstar ◴[] No.43792117[source]
It's true - they are all looking more and more similar.
3. codr7 ◴[] No.43796469[source]
True, the same mindset that lead Microsoft to create the Metro UI, which has similar appeal.