←back to thread

257 points delaugust | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.231s | source
Show context
rglover ◴[] No.43789059[source]
This is the paradox of the post social media world. I see a lot of mid-tier talent—in all sorts of disciplines/industries—being elevated, while what I personally consider the "greats" get a fraction of the attention (e.g., this designer who I love and have bought stuff from but seems to be a relative unknown [1]).

The book "Do the Work" explained it well: "The amateur tweets. The pro works." People who fit into the Shell Silverstein "I'm so good I don't have to brag" bucket aren't as visible because they're working, not talking about working.

Something fairly consistent I've observed: the popular people you see tweeting and on every podcast are likely not very good at what they're popular for.

Sometimes there's overlap, but it's the exception, not the rule.

[1] https://xtian.design/

replies(14): >>43789153 #>>43789960 #>>43790115 #>>43790193 #>>43790598 #>>43790636 #>>43790748 #>>43791019 #>>43791806 #>>43793427 #>>43794262 #>>43794290 #>>43794807 #>>43798067 #
1. motorest ◴[] No.43790598[source]
> People who fit into the Shell Silverstein "I'm so good I don't have to brag" bucket aren't as visible because they're working, not talking about working.

It isn't as much as "talking about working" but putting the bulk of their effort in self-promotion.

If you hire someone because they excelled at self-promotion, the reason you hired them is because they excelled at self-promotion. Not because they are great or even good, but because they are good at convincing the likes of you to hire the likes of them.

In business settings this sort of problem ends up being a vicious cycle. Anyone that hires a self-promoting scrub is motivated to make that decision look like a success as well, otherwise the scrub's failure will also be their own failure. If these scrubs output passable work instead of great or even good, that's something you as a manager can work with.