←back to thread

The effect of deactivating Facebook and Instagram on users' emotional state

(www.nber.org)
506 points imakwana | 1 comments | 21 Apr 25 04:24 UTC | HN request time: 0.227s | source
Show context
8s2ngy ◴[21 Apr 25 05:47 UTC] No.43748792[source]▶
I believe many of the problems in our current social media landscape could be solved by eliminating the "feed" and instead displaying posts, updates, and pictures from friends, family, and those we know in real life. This approach might conflict with the profit models of big tech social media and could go against what most people have become accustomed to. Personally, I would love a smaller social network where I can stay connected with my school friends, college friends, and distant family without having to see irrelevant posts, like some stupid remark from a politician halfway around the world or influencers doing something outrageous just for attention.
replies(44): >>43748823 #>>43748874 #>>43748878 #>>43748882 #>>43748912 #>>43748946 #>>43748985 #>>43748997 #>>43749037 #>>43749040 #>>43749043 #>>43749061 #>>43749129 #>>43749163 #>>43749264 #>>43749275 #>>43749625 #>>43749722 #>>43749867 #>>43750208 #>>43750767 #>>43750813 #>>43750966 #>>43751755 #>>43751799 #>>43751999 #>>43752008 #>>43752105 #>>43752184 #>>43752274 #>>43752423 #>>43752817 #>>43753125 #>>43753208 #>>43753655 #>>43753915 #>>43753930 #>>43753949 #>>43754346 #>>43759071 #>>43759189 #>>43766213 #>>43773772 #>>43828684 #
smelendez ◴[21 Apr 25 06:39 UTC] No.43748997[source]▶
This has moved heavily into group chats and I’m not sure it’s coming back.

Group chats are basically the Circles that Google+ saw the need for but could never get fully set up. A lot of people don’t want to share personal updates and photos to a broad swath of friends and acquaintances.

Meanwhile Instagram and Facebook keep evolving. Facebook is turning into a weird Reddit for older people. Instagram is turning into a hipper LinkedIn, where artists, musicians, and local businesses share career and business updates and advertise their wares.

replies(14): >>43749044 #>>43749126 #>>43749251 #>>43749477 #>>43749516 #>>43750401 #>>43750840 #>>43750856 #>>43751684 #>>43751697 #>>43752193 #>>43763125 #>>43765764 #>>43780924 #
Aromasin ◴[21 Apr 25 08:21 UTC] No.43749516[source]▶
Eh, I'd disagree on the Instagram front. If you look at the reels section, where most spend their time, it's just a more deplorable Tiktok. 80% of the content on there is soft core porn advertising one OnlyFans girl or another. The other 20% seems to be brain rot memes. I reinstalled it recently after 8 years of not having it, and immediately deleted it.
replies(1): >>43750268 #
prmoustache ◴[21 Apr 25 10:27 UTC] No.43750268[source]▶
I guess it really depends if you have fed the algorithm with your preferences already.
replies(4): >>43750982 #>>43751437 #>>43762785 #>>43764919 #
1. mrguyorama ◴[22 Apr 25 18:28 UTC] No.43764919[source]▶
The algorithm isn't designed to give everyone exactly what THEY want.

The algorithim is optimized for "engagement", and therefore optimized specifically to trigger addiction as quickly and effectively as possible. The lower level softcore porn and rage bait and brainrot memes are what triggers addiction in people prone to it.

It's exactly the same situation as slot machines. They are made by the same companies in many cases that made some of the best and most fun arcade and video games. But if you aren't prone to gambling addiction, they aren't fun, because they aren't optimized for fun, they are optimized for addiction. The same triggers and stimuli that are most effective at triggering addiction behaviors are LESS effective at being "fun" to non-addictive people.

"The algorithm" is literally not meant to feed people what they want. "The algorithm" serves only the interests of the company, which is to efficiently keep eyeballs looking at a feed in order to sell ads. Giving most people what they want is genuinely counter to that.