←back to thread

514 points mfiguiere | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
cube2222 ◴[] No.43709576[source]
Fingers crossed for this to work well! Claude Code is pretty excellent.

I’m actually legitimately surprised how good it is, since other coding agents I’ve used before have mostly been a letdown, which made me only use Claude in direct change prompting with Zed (“implement xyz here”, “rewrite this function with abc”, etc), so very hands-on.

So I’ve went into trying out Claude Code rather pessimistically, and now I’m using it all the time! Sure, it ends up costing a bunch, but it’s easy to justify $15 for a prompting session if the end result is a mostly complete PR, done much faster.

All that is to say - competition is good, fingers crossed for codex!

replies(5): >>43709602 #>>43709674 #>>43710104 #>>43710373 #>>43711662 #
retinaros ◴[] No.43709674[source]
too expensive. I cant understand why everyone is into claude code vs using claude in cursor or windsurf.
replies(7): >>43709708 #>>43709726 #>>43709771 #>>43710062 #>>43710067 #>>43710341 #>>43711006 #
_neil ◴[] No.43709726[source]
Anecdotally, Claude code performs much better than Claude within Cursor. Not sure if it’s a system prompt thing or if I’ve just convinced myself of it because the aesthetic is so much better, but either way the end result feels better to me.
replies(2): >>43709959 #>>43720450 #
rafaelmn ◴[] No.43720450[source]
One has the incentive to burn through as much tokens and the other has an incentive to use as little as possible
replies(1): >>43764332 #
1. _neil ◴[] No.43764332{3}[source]
Great point.