←back to thread

Pope Francis has died

(www.reuters.com)
916 points phillipharris | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
carlos-menezes ◴[] No.43749613[source]
https://www.vaticannews.va/en/pope/news/2025-04/pope-francis...

> According to Archbishop Diego Ravelli, Master of Apostolic Ceremonies, the late Pope Francis had requested that the funeral rites be simplified and focused on expressing the faith of the Church in the Risen Body of Christ.

Always struck me as a simple man and that likely contributed to people liking him more when compared to his predecessors. RIP.

replies(7): >>43749684 #>>43749955 #>>43750069 #>>43751768 #>>43752084 #>>43757136 #>>43757837 #
jjude ◴[] No.43749684[source]
Pope John Paul II was also extremely popular across the world.
replies(7): >>43749792 #>>43749871 #>>43749998 #>>43750048 #>>43750282 #>>43750744 #>>43757847 #
carlos-menezes ◴[] No.43749792[source]
He was, but John Paul II was traditionally conservative. I think Francis resonated with more people–Christian or not–because he emphasized compassion, humility, and social justice.

He spoke more openly about issues like poverty, climate change, and inclusion–his encyclical LAUDATO SI’ is a great read–, and he often used language and gestures that the "common man" could relate to.

Perhaps the way he dressed so simply–with the plain white cassock–also emphasized his overall approach: less focus on grandeur, more on service.

replies(8): >>43749991 #>>43749995 #>>43750044 #>>43750253 #>>43751539 #>>43751618 #>>43752699 #>>43766734 #
svieira ◴[] No.43752699[source]
He also spoke incredibly directly about abortion - "hiring a hitman" cuts right to the heart of the issue.
replies(1): >>43754424 #
lotsofpulp ◴[] No.43754424[source]
[flagged]
replies(1): >>43754527 #
bigstrat2003[dead post] ◴[] No.43754527[source]
[flagged]
lupusreal ◴[] No.43754759{3}[source]
I sincerely hope that at some point we can develop artificial wombs and use them to render this whole debate moot. Instead of abortion we can take the fetus out, put it into an artificial womb then let it be raised as an orphan or whatever. It should make both sides happy, IF they are both being honest about their motives.
replies(5): >>43754902 #>>43755026 #>>43756399 #>>43756519 #>>43760518 #
1. skissane ◴[] No.43760518{4}[source]
> Instead of abortion we can take the fetus out, put it into an artificial womb then let it be raised as an orphan or whatever. It should make both sides happy, IF they are both being honest about their motives.

I think very few people who have religious opposition to abortion would actually be happy about the advent of "artificial wombs". They might view it as a lesser evil, but not as a good thing. Because, while belief in the wrongfulness of deliberately killing an unborn child is an important motivator, it generally isn't the sole motivator – another important motivator is the belief that God has a plan for the process of human reproduction, and wandering too far off script is wrong in itself, with artificial wombs likely to be seen as going quite a long way off – at best maybe tolerable as a lesser evil in some cases.

replies(1): >>43760532 #
2. ta20240528 ◴[] No.43760532[source]
I think the money would be better spent in curing adults from believing in iron-age superstitions.
replies(1): >>43766557 #
3. skissane ◴[] No.43766557[source]
You can’t “cure” someone who doesn’t want to be “cured” and doesn’t believe there is anything wrong with them.

And trying to forcibly “cure” religion may potentially constitute the crime of genocide under international law

replies(1): >>43770306 #
4. ta20240528 ◴[] No.43770306{3}[source]
Well, at least we agree that religions are iron-age superstitions. :)

And I'm pretty sure I never suggested forcing anyone to do anything.