Most active commenters

    ←back to thread

    652 points toebee | 11 comments | | HN request time: 0.845s | source | bottom
    1. strobe ◴[] No.43754236[source]
    just in case, another opensource project using same name https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Dia/

    https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/dia

    replies(4): >>43754343 #>>43754991 #>>43755194 #>>43755245 #
    2. toebee ◴[] No.43754343[source]
    Thanks for the heads-up! We weren’t aware of the GNOME Dia project. Since we focus on speech AI, we’ll make sure to clarify that distinction.
    replies(1): >>43754781 #
    3. aclark ◴[] No.43754781[source]
    Ditto this! Dia diagram tool user here just noticing the name clash. Good luck with your Dia!! Assuming both can exist in harmony. :-)
    replies(1): >>43756248 #
    4. Magma7404 ◴[] No.43754991[source]
    I know it's a bit ridiculous to see that as some kind of conspiracy, but I have seen a very long list of AI-related projects that got the same name as a famous open-source project, as if they wanted to hijack the popularity of those projects, and Dia is yet another example. It was relatively famous a few years ago and you cannot have forgotten it if you used Linux for more than a few weeks. It's almost done on purpose.
    replies(1): >>43755121 #
    5. teddyh ◴[] No.43755121[source]
    The generous interpretation is that the AI hype people just didn’t know about those other projects, i.e. that they are neither open source developers, nor users.
    replies(1): >>43756075 #
    6. SoKamil ◴[] No.43755194[source]
    And another one, not open source but in AI sphere: https://www.diabrowser.com/
    7. freedomben ◴[] No.43755245[source]
    Fun, I can't get to it because I can't get past the "Making sure you're not a bot!" page. It's just stuck at "calculating...". I understand the desire to slow down AI bots, but . If all the gnome apps are now behind this, they just completely shut down a small-time contributor. I love to play with Gnome apps and help out with things here and there, but I'm not going to fight with this damn thing to do so.
    replies(1): >>43755550 #
    8. ◴[] No.43755550[source]
    9. gapan ◴[] No.43756075{3}[source]
    Of course, how could they have known? Doing a basic web search before deciding on a name is so last year.
    replies(1): >>43764078 #
    10. mrandish ◴[] No.43756248{3}[source]
    > Assuming both can exist in harmony.

    I'm sure they can... talk it over.

    I'll show myself out.

    11. teddyh ◴[] No.43764078{4}[source]
    Maybe they only asked an LLM about it?