←back to thread

506 points imakwana | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.218s | source
Show context
nomilk ◴[] No.43748834[source]
The surprise here is how little of an effect it has. Deactivating facebook makes you only 1/16th of one standard deviation happier. And instagram even less. And this was measured during elections, when the effect is likely to be greatest.

Kinda crazy that the magnitude is so small! (my next [admittedly rather cynical] thought is "who funded this?")

replies(13): >>43748884 #>>43748905 #>>43748936 #>>43748945 #>>43748990 #>>43749080 #>>43749338 #>>43749527 #>>43750904 #>>43751816 #>>43752078 #>>43752906 #>>43754629 #
thinkingemote ◴[] No.43748945[source]
Removing one dopamine addicting and cortisol antagonising source might just be replaced by more of all the other sources that are being consumed. Perhaps they just watched TV news more, for example?

But perhaps the study shows that the effect works in the right direction even if small and even when replaced by any other behaviours that cause unhappiness, depression and anxiety.

replies(1): >>43753786 #
1. zeroonetwothree ◴[] No.43753786[source]
It's like if you ask people to quit drinking beer but then they just drink wine instead. It might be a tiny bit healthier but it doesn't get at the underlying problem. And it wouldn't be fair to fault beer by itself for their negative experiences.