←back to thread

Pope Francis has died

(www.reuters.com)
916 points phillipharris | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.24s | source
Show context
carlos-menezes ◴[] No.43749613[source]
https://www.vaticannews.va/en/pope/news/2025-04/pope-francis...

> According to Archbishop Diego Ravelli, Master of Apostolic Ceremonies, the late Pope Francis had requested that the funeral rites be simplified and focused on expressing the faith of the Church in the Risen Body of Christ.

Always struck me as a simple man and that likely contributed to people liking him more when compared to his predecessors. RIP.

replies(7): >>43749684 #>>43749955 #>>43750069 #>>43751768 #>>43752084 #>>43757136 #>>43757837 #
keepamovin ◴[] No.43749955[source]
I thought the film the Two Popes gave a good overview of his life and perspective.
replies(1): >>43750605 #
gortok ◴[] No.43750605[source]
It’s important to note that The Two Popes was a drama, and not a true factual story.

It fictionalizes and sensationalizes some details; and that’s ok because its purpose is to make you feel exactly the way you feel about it.

Pope Francis was a wonderful steward of Christianity and espoused the virtues that anyone would want to see in their religious leaders: humility, grace, an openness to listen and a strong voice against even prelates in his own church that are xenophobic or nationalistic. He wanted us to welcome all and to live as the bible said Jesus did.

The fear I have is that each swing of the pendulum goes in two directions. He was far more “liberal” than the conservative Catholic prelates of the USCCB, and I fear his actions — including rightfully limiting the Latin mass, will force the church to swing in the other direction and give in to the illiberal forces that divide us.

replies(2): >>43750672 #>>43750950 #
ralfd ◴[] No.43750950[source]
> including rightfully limiting the Latin mass

Why is that a political thing though? The mass of the roman church was for centuries (almost all it’s history?) in latin.

replies(3): >>43751065 #>>43753264 #>>43753387 #
tptacek ◴[] No.43753264[source]
It's complicated. Few people in the church, including the priests themselves, are fluent in Latin (there's a story told, I think by Francis himself, about an diocese in England that required priests to pass an exam to give a Traditional Latin Mass, and almost none of the requesting priests could pass). The TLM obscures what the mass is about, which creates space for practitioners to substitute in their own things, which, as it happens, tends to be idiosyncratically ultra-conservative stuff. The church is a top-down institution, and the TLM gets in the way of that and divides it.

(I like Latin! Took it in high school, reading Lingua Latina for fun; I think the TLM is neat. But problematic.)

replies(4): >>43753398 #>>43755995 #>>43760392 #>>43824538 #
1. pcwalton ◴[] No.43753398[source]
For fun, try searching YouTube for "speaking latin at the vatican". It's hard to find people who can speak it even there!
replies(1): >>43756004 #
2. ithkuil ◴[] No.43756004[source]
sed invenire potes ibi scorpiōnem martianum