←back to thread

Python’s new t-strings

(davepeck.org)
620 points tambourine_man | 1 comments | 21 Apr 25 04:31 UTC | HN request time: 0.327s | source
Show context
enescakir ◴[21 Apr 25 07:32 UTC] No.43749266[source]▶
Not sure about introducing yet another string prefix. Between f-strings, raw strings, and i18n stuff, it’s already getting crowded. Curious how readable this will be in large codebases.
replies(3): >>43749334 #>>43749489 #>>43749515 #
albert_e ◴[21 Apr 25 08:20 UTC] No.43749515[source]▶
"Yet another" is not my main worry

The concept of prefixes itself feels a little deviant from readable code that is close to human language -- which is the spirit of Python

replies(3): >>43749659 #>>43749755 #>>43749968 #
1. empiko ◴[21 Apr 25 09:00 UTC] No.43749755[source]▶
Additionally, it will probably be confusing that it is called a t-string but it is actually a constructor for a Template object and not string at all. I would rather see a new special term `template` than this.