(www.youtube.com)

354 points qingcharles | 3 comments | 21 Apr 25 02:47 UTC | HN request time: 0.695s | source

Show context

goblin89 ◴[21 Apr 25 05:12 UTC] No.43748669[source]▶

Wait until physical camera makers not only license you the unit, but also make everything you shoot belong to them, like software camera apps (e.g., Filmic Pro) do now.

DJI can just add some mandatory firmware upgrade process that offloads your footage to the mothership, and 99.9999% will agree to everything without reading.

replies(1): >>43748758 #

mitthrowaway2 ◴[21 Apr 25 05:36 UTC] No.43748758[source]▶

>>43748669 #

Might be a realistic way for manufacturers to to implement a certified-taken-by-camera-not-AI photo feature.

replies(5): >>43748837 #>>43748899 #>>43748942 #>>43749487 #>>43749649 #

1. goblin89 ◴[21 Apr 25 08:42 UTC] No.43749649[source]▶

>>43748758 #

That way already exists and it does not require licensing your footage to any third party.

Frankly, I find the justification you provide preposterous and dangerous.

The sad reality is that apparently many customers will find it believable (in the .0001% of cases when they actually read what they are agreeing to).

replies(1): >>43754014 #

2. mitthrowaway2 ◴[21 Apr 25 16:56 UTC] No.43754014[source]▶