←back to thread

506 points imakwana | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.373s | source
Show context
nomilk ◴[] No.43748834[source]
The surprise here is how little of an effect it has. Deactivating facebook makes you only 1/16th of one standard deviation happier. And instagram even less. And this was measured during elections, when the effect is likely to be greatest.

Kinda crazy that the magnitude is so small! (my next [admittedly rather cynical] thought is "who funded this?")

replies(13): >>43748884 #>>43748905 #>>43748936 #>>43748945 #>>43748990 #>>43749080 #>>43749338 #>>43749527 #>>43750904 #>>43751816 #>>43752078 #>>43752906 #>>43754629 #
1. nabla9 ◴[] No.43749527[source]
> The fact that less than one percent of the people who were invited to the study completed the experiment underscores that one should be cautious in generalizing results outside our sample. Most of this sample selection is driven by the fact that only a few percent of people click on research study invitations or social media ad

The self selection bias in these ad based invitation studies is just out of whack.

I suspect that those who participate were already considering quitting.