←back to thread

354 points qingcharles | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.225s | source
Show context
Frieren ◴[] No.43748615[source]
It should be forbidden for all device manufacturers to make apps, tracking, registering, etc. mandatory.

Every TV, phone, camera, tablet, fridge, ... is becoming a spying device like in the worst scifi dystopias. And as soon as the company stops supporting them they become trash to pollute the planet so they can sell you the next one.

Regulations should have come a decade a go. We own nothing, we have no privacy, we are sold products 24/7. I will vote for a goverment that protects me of this total corporate surveillance. It is their duty towards citizens to do so.

And it will happen, like feudalism died this techno-feudalism will die too.

replies(18): >>43748682 #>>43748888 #>>43749025 #>>43749036 #>>43749133 #>>43749141 #>>43749184 #>>43749313 #>>43749723 #>>43749759 #>>43749812 #>>43750135 #>>43750302 #>>43750490 #>>43750674 #>>43751813 #>>43754173 #>>43756589 #
loki49152 ◴[] No.43749141[source]
We don't need new regulations. This is probably covered by commercial fraud statutes, as they represented the sale of the device as a sale of tangible personal property. There is no condition required to complete that purchase - the offer is of the physical device and the implied ability to use that device for its obvious purpose.
replies(4): >>43749189 #>>43749193 #>>43749279 #>>43749934 #
1. inopinatus ◴[] No.43749189[source]
Omitting a regulator makes enforcement a civil matter and the entire burden is placed on the consumer, which is to say, the legal scales are tipped throughly in favour of rogue manufacturers. Good luck suing DJI; you’ll obtain neither satisfaction nor restitution, and it’ll take years of being strung along by lawyers to realise it.

The even worse outcome of failing to protect the consumer at the point of sale is you’ve tacitly swallowed the tenets of an authoritarian surveillance state.