The prompt would also maybe be better if it encouraged variety in diagrams. For somethings, a flow chart would fit better than a sequence diagram (e.g., a durable state machine workflow written using AWS Step Functions).
The prompt would also maybe be better if it encouraged variety in diagrams. For somethings, a flow chart would fit better than a sequence diagram (e.g., a durable state machine workflow written using AWS Step Functions).
I don’t think the outright dismissal of AI is smart. (And, OP, I don’t mean to imply that you are doing that. I mean this generally.)
I also suspect people who level these criticisms have never really used a frontier LLM.
Feeding in a whole codebase that I’m familiar with, and hearing the LLM give good answers about its purpose and implementation from a completely cold read is very impressive.
Even if the LLM never writes a line of code - this is still valuable, because helping humans understand software faster means you can help humans write software faster.
IMHO, Ai text additions are generally not valuable and I assume, until proven wrong, that Ai text provides little to no value.
I have seen so many startups fold after they made some ai product that on the surface level appeared impressive but provided no substantial value.
Now, I will be impressed by the ai that can remove code without affecting the product.