←back to thread

230 points perryflynn | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
john01dav ◴[] No.43747099[source]
Even with all of this onerous encryption and DRM, it's not hard to find pirated copies of movies. It makes me think that the sacrifice in ownership rights for the theaters over their equipment isn't worth it.
replies(7): >>43747126 #>>43747412 #>>43747502 #>>43748205 #>>43748460 #>>43750381 #>>43760249 #
perryflynn ◴[] No.43747502[source]
It also contains watermarks. So theatres which failed to prevent recording will run into serious issues. See https://dcpomatic.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2372
replies(3): >>43747796 #>>43747864 #>>43748013 #
coppsilgold ◴[] No.43748013[source]
If the software to watermark is widely available (as it appears to be) then an adversary has all they need to corrupt any existing watermark.

These steganographic watermarks depend on no knowledge of the process. If the method is particularly ingenious (one of the inputs is centrally stored entropy which the extractor references by trialing them all) then knowledge of the process alone may not be sufficient to obtain a high quality result (as too much corruption may be required) but could be used to inform the next step:

If you obtain two or more copies of the decrypted content you will be able to diff them and work out what you need to corrupt even without knowledge of the watermarking process. This probably won't work with pirated CAM's or take quite an effort to find the signal in the noise.

Edit: After some more research it looks like they don't actually watermark the distributed data (the movie sent to cinemas). The projector inserts its unique watermark during playback. There may be other secret watermarks put in by distributors not mentioned anywhere.

replies(3): >>43748244 #>>43748467 #>>43749452 #
1. thr0w ◴[] No.43748244[source]
> If you obtain two or more copies of the decrypted content you will be able to diff them and work out what you need to corrupt even without knowledge of the watermarking process.

By the time you've destroyed enough of the signal to remove the watermark, the content is unwatchable.

replies(1): >>43766878 #
2. ranger_danger ◴[] No.43766878[source]
How would one know this? Care to share with the class?