←back to thread

Jagged AGI: o3, Gemini 2.5, and everything after

(www.oneusefulthing.org)
265 points ctoth | 2 comments | 20 Apr 25 14:55 UTC | HN request time: 0.472s | source
Show context
gilbetron ◴[20 Apr 25 22:57 UTC] No.43747151[source]▶
AGI that is bad at some things is still AGI. We have AGI, it is just bad at some things and hallucinates. It is literally smarter than many people I know, but that doesn't mean it can beat a human at anything. That would be ASI, which, hopefully, will take a while to get here.

Although, I could be argued into calling what we have already ASI - take a human and Gemini 2.5, and put them through a barrage of omni-disciplinary questions and situations and problems. Gemini 2.5 will win, but not absolutely.

AGI (we have) ASI (we might have) AOI (Artificial Omniscient Intelligence, will hopefully take a while to get here)

replies(3): >>43747290 #>>43747305 #>>43750461 #
1. ramesh31 ◴[20 Apr 25 23:26 UTC] No.43747305[source]▶
>”Although, I could be argued into calling what we have already ASI - take a human and Gemini 2.5, and put them through a barrage of omni-disciplinary questions and situations and problems. Gemini 2.5 will win, but not absolutely.”

Except for writing a joke that will make you laugh, a poem that will make you cry, or a work of art that evokes deep introspection.

Intelligence is much deeper and more nuanced than answering questions of rote knowledge. LLMs are fantastic “reasoning engines”, but the soul is simply not there yet.

replies(1): >>43747969 #
2. gilbetron ◴[21 Apr 25 02:09 UTC] No.43747969[source]▶
Ok, tell me a joke that I'll find funny - but you can't look it up.

I asked GPT to do so and I chuckled out loud.