←back to thread

265 points ctoth | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
gilbetron ◴[] No.43747151[source]
AGI that is bad at some things is still AGI. We have AGI, it is just bad at some things and hallucinates. It is literally smarter than many people I know, but that doesn't mean it can beat a human at anything. That would be ASI, which, hopefully, will take a while to get here.

Although, I could be argued into calling what we have already ASI - take a human and Gemini 2.5, and put them through a barrage of omni-disciplinary questions and situations and problems. Gemini 2.5 will win, but not absolutely.

AGI (we have) ASI (we might have) AOI (Artificial Omniscient Intelligence, will hopefully take a while to get here)

replies(3): >>43747290 #>>43747305 #>>43750461 #
1. jzig ◴[] No.43747290[source]
ASI? AOI?

Might as well call it “ultrathink”!