←back to thread

Inside ArXiv

(www.wired.com)
167 points fprog | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
Y_Y[dead post] ◴[] No.43738814[source]
[flagged]
MinimalAction ◴[] No.43739136[source]
arXiv has nothing to gain by a PR blitz. Any academic knows what is arXiv exactly for, and there is no intention to grow user base or whatever. It's not a social media.
replies(2): >>43739190 #>>43744017 #
1. fogof ◴[] No.43739190[source]
Not sure I agree with the comment you're responding to. But the article discusses some of their funding troubles, and the main mage of arxiv.org itself has a donate link. So I think perhaps the media presence might be motivated by a desire to fundraise (and IMO they absolutely deserve funding because of the important work they do).
replies(1): >>43739248 #
2. MinimalAction ◴[] No.43739248[source]
You're right. I didn't consider the funding angle at all, but only the accusation of "enshittification" which usually comes from a VC or an entity that wants to generate more profits by expanding. On the other hand, I do think Simons Foundations would not let arXiv die. Also, I don't agree that arXiv's media presence has ulterior motives after all. It might just be that it's getting its share of fame.