←back to thread

34 points rbanffy | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.204s | source
Show context
fasteddie31003 ◴[] No.43737296[source]
Am I wrong to assume that science that is harder to prove will have less impact on human wellbeing? Electricity is easy to run experiments on and prove, meaning humans can manipulate it for our benefits easy. However, the Higgs Boson was extremely difficult to prove and I see no way that it could ever benefit humanity's wellbeing. Now how could humans improve our wellbeing by manipulating dark matter?
replies(7): >>43737380 #>>43737451 #>>43737456 #>>43737774 #>>43738508 #>>43738823 #>>43739266 #
1. sightbroke ◴[] No.43738823[source]
I hope I am not wrong in imagining you may consider grouping quantum mechanics (QM) with research that has no way to ever benefit "humanity's well-being". (Even if I'd argue like art pure science & maths benefit humanity's well-being for it's own sake). This is relevant since accelerators like which was used for the Higgs Boson discovery are also used in general QM research:

https://www.energy.gov/science/doe-explainsquantum-mechanics

> Quantum mechanics led to the development of things like lasers, light-emitting diodes, transistors, medical imaging, electron microscopes, and a host of other modern devices.

Additionally, it's ironic that you mentioned the Higgs-Boson, while perhaps many years before it's discovery and maybe not research CERN was anticipating in doing it did come up with the first webserver:

https://home.cern/science/computing/birth-web/short-history-...