←back to thread

34 points rbanffy | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.276s | source
Show context
rzz3 ◴[] No.43738153[source]
I’ve always felt like (as neither a mathematician nor a physicist) that “dark matter” is simply just something that suddenly makes a math problem work to model the universe-—and that in reality, that math problem just doesn’t work.

Is my theory even _possible_ here, or am I missing something. Really fundamental?

replies(4): >>43738163 #>>43738206 #>>43738215 #>>43738339 #
luma ◴[] No.43738206[source]
Dark matter is a proposition put forward to explain observations. It’s not a result of pretty math, it’s the result of a lot of different observations which don’t align with the current math unless you stick something like dark matter into it.
replies(2): >>43738248 #>>43745026 #
1. jvanderbot ◴[] No.43738248[source]
So yes. It is a missing term that balances our models of physics against observations. The implications of that term and hypothesis as to its physical reality are what we are trying to figure out right?