←back to thread

Google is winning on every AI front

(www.thealgorithmicbridge.com)
993 points vinhnx | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
levocardia ◴[] No.43662083[source]
Google is winning on every front except... marketing (Google has a chatbot?), trust (who knew the founding fathers were so diverse?), safety (where's the 2.5 Pro model card?), market share (fully one in ten internet users on the planet are weekly ChatGPT users), and, well, vibes (who's rooting for big G, exactly?).

But I will admit, Gemini Pro 2.5 is a legit good model. So, hats off for that.

replies(17): >>43662192 #>>43662408 #>>43662475 #>>43662882 #>>43662886 #>>43663093 #>>43663446 #>>43663516 #>>43663774 #>>43664230 #>>43665053 #>>43665425 #>>43665442 #>>43666747 #>>43667190 #>>43667707 #>>43676555 #
rzz3 ◴[] No.43662886[source]
You really hit the nail on the head with trust. Knowing the power of these AIs and how absolutely little I trust Google, I’d never tell trust Gemini with the things I’ll say to ChatGPT.
replies(3): >>43662953 #>>43663078 #>>43666143 #
squigz ◴[] No.43663078[source]
Why do you think OpenAI is more trustworthy than Google?
replies(4): >>43663444 #>>43665923 #>>43670752 #>>43732420 #
rzz3 ◴[] No.43732420[source]
Mainly because I see moral alignment and I see Sam Altman as a person of good moral standing. I don’t see any perception of morality from Google, just a faceless mega corporation.
replies(1): >>43732545 #
1. alganet ◴[] No.43732545[source]
That is troubling. What happens if he leaves then?

Cult of personality is blinding. But I could be wrong in my interpretation. Would you be able to put what that moral standing is about in prose without engaging in public figure examples?