Thinking about security risks is an odd concern to have?
Great security teams get paid to "worry", by which I mean "make a plan" for a given attack tree.
Your use of "odd" looks like a rhetorical technique to downplay legitimate security considerations. From my point of view, you are casually waving away an essential area of security. See:
https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/cyberpedia/data-exfiltratio...
> but you should not be exposing these kinds of services to the public internet (or giving them access to the public internet), eliminating the concern that it's giving your data away.
Let's evaluate the following claim: "a "properly" isolated system would, in theory, have no risk of data exfiltration. Now we have to define what we mean. Isolated from the network? Running in a sandbox? What happens when that system can interact with a compromised system? What happens when people mess up?
From a security POV, any software could have some component that is malicious, compromised, or backdoored. It might be in the project itself or in the supply chain. And so on.
Defense in depth matters. None of the above concerns are "odd". A good security team is going to factor these in.
P.S. If you mean "low probability" then just say that.
I think these kinds of concerns are more valid for storage systems which serve online traffic or have some kind of connection to the outside world.
Really? More rhetoric that minimizes legitimate security concerns?
Again, if someone wants to make the claim that such concerns are "low probability" that would at least be defensible.
https://www.cisecurity.org/insights/blog/deepseek-a-new-play...