←back to thread

174 points Philpax | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.201s | source
Show context
dcchambers ◴[] No.43720006[source]
And in 30 years it will be another 30 years away.

LLMs are so incredibly useful and powerful but they will NEVER be AGI. I actually wonder if the success of (and subsequent obsession with) LLMs is putting true AGI further out of reach. All that these AI companies see are the $$$. When the biggest "AI Research Labs" like OpenAI shifted to product-izing their LLM offerings I think the writing was on the wall that they don't actually care about finding AGI.

replies(3): >>43720042 #>>43720073 #>>43721975 #
thomasahle ◴[] No.43720042[source]
People will keep improving LLMs, and by the time they are AGI (less than 30 years), you will say, "Well, these are no longer LLMs."
replies(6): >>43720091 #>>43720108 #>>43720115 #>>43720202 #>>43720341 #>>43721154 #
Spartan-S63 ◴[] No.43720108[source]
What was the point of this comment? It's confrontational and doesn't add anything to the conversation. If you disagree, you could have just said that, or not commented at all.
replies(2): >>43720180 #>>43722080 #
logicchains ◴[] No.43720180[source]
The people who go around saying "LLMs aren't intelligent" while refusing to define exactly what they mean by intelligence (and hence not making a meaningful/testable claim) add nothing to the conversation.
replies(2): >>43722013 #>>43723651 #
1. AnimalMuppet ◴[] No.43722013[source]
OK, but the people who go around saying "LLMs are intelligent" are in the same boat...