←back to thread

174 points Philpax | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
codingwagie ◴[] No.43719845[source]
I just used o3 to design a distributed scheduler that scales to 1M+ sxchedules a day. It was perfect, and did better than two weeks of thought around the best way to build this.
replies(8): >>43719906 #>>43720086 #>>43720092 #>>43721143 #>>43721297 #>>43722293 #>>43723047 #>>43727685 #
timeon ◴[] No.43721297[source]
I'm not sure what is your point in context of AGI topic.
replies(1): >>43721320 #
codingwagie ◴[] No.43721320[source]
im a tenured engineer, spent a long time at faang. was casually beat this morning by a far superior design from an llm.
replies(1): >>43721517 #
darod ◴[] No.43721517[source]
is this because the LLM actually reasoned on a better design or because it found a better design in its "database" scoured from another tenured engineer.
replies(2): >>43721581 #>>43721589 #
1. anthonypasq ◴[] No.43721581[source]
who cares?
replies(1): >>43722135 #
2. awkwardpotato ◴[] No.43722135[source]
Ignoring the copyright issues, credit issues, and any ethical concerns... this approach doesn't work for anything not in the "database", it's not AGI and the tangential experience is barely relevant to the article.