←back to thread

163 points hugodutka | 6 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source | bottom
1. StevenNunez ◴[] No.43721223[source]
How did you get that org name!?
replies(1): >>43722073 #
2. kylecarbs ◴[] No.43722073[source]
It was inactive for a long time [1]. I emailed GitHub about it and they gave it to us!

[1]: https://web.archive.org/web/20201108093051/https://github.co...

replies(2): >>43723282 #>>43723831 #
3. WXLCKNO ◴[] No.43723282[source]
Wow.

For all the usernames I've ever tried getting (and failed cause they don't give out inactive usernames on most platforms), that's amazing.

replies(1): >>43723411 #
4. gunalx ◴[] No.43723411{3}[source]
In my opinion pretty terrible that github nilly willy can decide your org was inactive for too long and give it a new owner. (tbf i dont really know for how long and how inactive but still, this is potentially a security vulnerability with github)
replies(1): >>43726394 #
5. helsinki ◴[] No.43723831[source]
Can you share the e-mail?
6. siliconwitch ◴[] No.43726394{4}[source]
Probably since no one has abused this mechanism yet. I’m sure if people start trying to vacuum up inactive accounts, it might become a problem