←back to thread

235 points colinprince | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.239s | source
Show context
nekochanwork ◴[] No.43718533[source]
SCOTUS ruled in Mathews v. United States (1998) and in Jacobson v. United States (1992) that the government cannot induce a person to commit a crime, then arrest that individual for that crime.

Now the government is rolling out fully-automated entrapment bots.

replies(6): >>43718597 #>>43718661 #>>43718759 #>>43718803 #>>43719338 #>>43719814 #
gruez ◴[] No.43718803[source]
>Now the government is rolling out fully-automated entrapment bots.

Are we reading the same article? Hand wringing about slippery slopes aside, I skimmed the article and the actual messages that the AI sent are pretty benign. For instance, the "jason" persona seems to be only asking/answering biographical questions. The messages sent by the pimp persona encourages the sex worker to collect what her clients owe her. None of the messages show the AI radicalizing a college student activist into burning down a storefront or whatever.

replies(2): >>43719758 #>>43720669 #
1. UncleEntity ◴[] No.43720669[source]
> None of the messages show the AI radicalizing a college student activist into burning down a storefront or whatever.

Yeah, I'm sure they're going to put that in their promotional materials...