←back to thread

Google is illegally monopolizing online advertising tech, judge rules

(www.nytimes.com)
863 points IdealeZahlen | 1 comments | 17 Apr 25 14:47 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
megaman821 ◴[17 Apr 25 15:50 UTC] No.43718617[source]▶
I don't think this article explains it well. Google sells ad space on behalf of the publishers and also sells the ads on behalf of the advertisers. It also runs the auction that places the ads into the ad space. See this graphic https://images.app.goo.gl/ADx5xrAnWNicgoFu7. Parts of this can definately be broken up without destroying Google.
replies(19): >>43718672 #>>43718693 #>>43718751 #>>43718794 #>>43718938 #>>43719033 #>>43719196 #>>43719219 #>>43719246 #>>43719395 #>>43719429 #>>43719463 #>>43720402 #>>43720461 #>>43720510 #>>43721628 #>>43722559 #>>43723479 #>>43724604 #
coliveira ◴[17 Apr 25 15:55 UTC] No.43718672[source]▶
Google can extract as much money as they want from this equation, up to the limit of available capital for advertising. They just need to squeeze more from publishers and at the same time increase click costs. They have been doing both of these for several years.
replies(1): >>43719060 #
riku_iki ◴[17 Apr 25 16:24 UTC] No.43719060[source]▶
> They just need to squeeze more from publishers and at the same time increase click costs.

but publishers receive stable share of click cost (67%?), so they should be happy with this arrangement.

replies(2): >>43719301 #>>43719796 #
1. ◴[17 Apr 25 16:43 UTC] No.43719301{3}[source]▶