←back to thread

634 points RVRX | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.293s | source
Show context
autoexec ◴[] No.43712216[source]
Markmonitor and zoom are both terrible companies so I can't feel bad about this
replies(3): >>43712243 #>>43712335 #>>43713954 #
__float ◴[] No.43712243[source]
What's wrong with Markmonitor? They don't have nearly the customer base of Zoom (where I can relate to any complaints, I'm sure)
replies(1): >>43712299 #
autoexec ◴[] No.43712299[source]
They've earned themselves a reputation for sending false DMCA notices.

https://www.inquisitr.com/markmonitor-sends-false-copyright-...

https://torrentfreak.com/record-labels-defeat-false-dmca-tak...

https://torrentfreak.com/court-dismisses-charters-claims-of-...

https://torrentfreak.com/hbo-wants-google-to-censor-hbo-com-...

https://torrentfreak.com/after-4-years-copyright-holders-sti...

They haven't even always been good to their own clients: https://torrentfreak.com/anti-piracy-lawfirm-defrauded-right...

replies(1): >>43716263 #
voxic11 ◴[] No.43716263[source]
Can you explain what that last article has to do with MarkMonitor? To me it just sounds like MarkMonitor once bought a company from a law firm which was sued for fraud 5 years after the sale was completed. So it doesn't appear that MarkMonitor was in any way related to the fraud which occurred.
replies(1): >>43718979 #
1. autoexec ◴[] No.43718979[source]
Good call out! If Schlüter didn't continue doing work for DtecNet after the sale to MarkMonitor then we can't really blame MarkMonitor for the things he was doing 5 years later.