(www.nytimes.com)

Show context

lupka ◴[17 Apr 25 15:18 UTC] No.43718153[source]▶

Happy to see this and hopefully there are some changes. Right now I'm dealing with a crazy Adsense issue and there is no recourse, no customer support and no alternative.

replies(3): >>43718586 #>>43718619 #>>43718696 #

1. robertlagrant ◴[17 Apr 25 15:57 UTC] No.43718696[source]▶

>>43718153 #

Just switch away from Adsense.

replies(1): >>43719202 #

2. lupka ◴[17 Apr 25 16:36 UTC] No.43719202[source]▶

>>43718696 (TP) #

Do you have a recommendation of an alternative that I can switch to easily and on short notice? The site I'm having trouble with gets 95% of its traffic for the year this week so I'm scrambling.

replies(2): >>43719433 #>>43719939 #

3. robertlagrant ◴[17 Apr 25 16:54 UTC] No.43719433[source]▶

>>43719202 #

Sorry I don't - I was purely prompting the idea that there should be no anti-trust related issue that would stop you switching.

replies(1): >>43719612 #

4. robertlagrant ◴[17 Apr 25 17:08 UTC] No.43719612{3}[source]▶

>>43719433 #

A drop-in replacement for Adsense is a very good idea though. I wonder if someone knows of one here.

replies(1): >>43734165 #

5. vivzkestrel ◴[17 Apr 25 17:36 UTC] No.43719939[source]▶

>>43719202 #

tried carbon ads?

6. owebmaster ◴[19 Apr 25 04:15 UTC] No.43734165{4}[source]▶

>>43719612 #

maybe a monopoly prevented its viability. Maybe.

↑

Google is illegally monopolizing online advertising tech, judge rules