←back to thread

634 points RVRX | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.236s | source
Show context
Animats ◴[] No.43712702[source]
That seriously devalues MarkMonitor's services. MarkMonitor claims to be a "an ICANN-accredited registrar and recognized industry leader since 1999". The whole point of paying for MarkMonitor is that they're an expensive service for valuable domains and are not allowed to screw up. GoDaddy should not be involved here at all.
replies(12): >>43712709 #>>43712833 #>>43713101 #>>43713501 #>>43713509 #>>43714082 #>>43714250 #>>43714371 #>>43715127 #>>43719584 #>>43719616 #>>43724570 #
renegade-otter ◴[] No.43714371[source]
These big companies spend tens of millions on homegrown tooling, even their own languages and databases, but they can't assign one dev to write a domain-monitoring tool?
replies(5): >>43714487 #>>43714549 #>>43715348 #>>43717280 #>>43717551 #
1. zippergz ◴[] No.43717551[source]
Markmonitor is much more about the people and service behind it rather than the software. To replace markmonitor you don't need a dev to write a tool. You need a dev to write a tool, and then a team of people who build relationships with everyone in the domain world and are available 24/7 to make calls and deal with issues if they come up.