←back to thread

634 points RVRX | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.212s | source
Show context
Animats ◴[] No.43712702[source]
That seriously devalues MarkMonitor's services. MarkMonitor claims to be a "an ICANN-accredited registrar and recognized industry leader since 1999". The whole point of paying for MarkMonitor is that they're an expensive service for valuable domains and are not allowed to screw up. GoDaddy should not be involved here at all.
replies(12): >>43712709 #>>43712833 #>>43713101 #>>43713501 #>>43713509 #>>43714082 #>>43714250 #>>43714371 #>>43715127 #>>43719584 #>>43719616 #>>43724570 #
renegade-otter ◴[] No.43714371[source]
These big companies spend tens of millions on homegrown tooling, even their own languages and databases, but they can't assign one dev to write a domain-monitoring tool?
replies(5): >>43714487 #>>43714549 #>>43715348 #>>43717280 #>>43717551 #
1. crazygringo ◴[] No.43717280[source]
Because it's cheaper and more reliable to outsource that to a company specializing in it.

If one dev had written it, how many times would that tool have failed by now? When the original dev left the company a decade ago, the tool has been transferred between teams six times, it failed a migration and the email address it used to send errors to no longer exists so nobody noticed, and it's literally gotten lost in the shuffle?