←back to thread

634 points RVRX | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.398s | source
Show context
ajdude ◴[] No.43712307[source]
A few years ago I had a .us TLD. I eventually decided that I probably shouldn't be reliant on a country code for my domain, it's the same reason why I don't use .io

I'm not saying that this couldn't have happened with a gTLD But why put your brand at the mercy of a government like that?

replies(5): >>43712339 #>>43712351 #>>43712427 #>>43712517 #>>43713171 #
lucb1e ◴[] No.43712351[source]
What TLD is not subject to a country's laws? .aq? .su?

Edit: .eu might be an even better candidate for this requirement, but you can ask British former domain owners how that worked out

gTLDs just subject you to an additional layer of incompetence, namely from the company running it. The government where they're located can still come knocking. It's also not like e.g. .nl is run by the Dutch government officials, it's a nonprofit started by some people in the 80s iirc

replies(4): >>43712449 #>>43714336 #>>43715135 #>>43715929 #
1. agwa ◴[] No.43715929[source]
> gTLDs just subject you to an additional layer of incompetence, namely from the company running it.

ccTLDs also have to be run by some organization, which is often a private company. Maybe the country's oversight over this organization is better than ICANN's oversight over gTLD operators. Maybe it's not. Historically, the worst technical incidents have occurred at ccTLDs.