←back to thread

417 points fuidani | 6 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source | bottom
Show context
seanhunter ◴[] No.43714467[source]
Firstly that is completely badass science. The idea that you can use observations to detect the chemical composition of an exoplanet millions of kilometres away is an absolute triumph of the work of thousands of people over hundreds of years. Really amazing and deeply humbling to me.

Secondly, my prior was always that life existed outside of earth. It just seems so unlikely that we are somehow that special. If life developed here I always felt it overwhelmingly likely that it developed elsewhere too given how incredibly unfathomably vast the universe is.

replies(14): >>43714565 #>>43714577 #>>43714584 #>>43714631 #>>43714656 #>>43714773 #>>43714830 #>>43714875 #>>43714914 #>>43714940 #>>43714971 #>>43715045 #>>43717003 #>>43717397 #
ta8645 ◴[] No.43714565[source]
If life is very common in the universe, then that is probably bad news for us. It means that civilizations should exist that are millions of years more technologically advanced than us; and should be leaving telltale signatures across the sky that we'd likely have detected by now. And the absence of those signs would be relatively strong evidence that life, while common, isn't long-lived. Suggesting that our demise too, will come before too long.

If, on the other hand, life is relatively rare, or we're the sole example, our future can't be statistically estimated that way.

replies(34): >>43714604 #>>43714608 #>>43714615 #>>43714618 #>>43714624 #>>43714625 #>>43714636 #>>43714650 #>>43714691 #>>43714706 #>>43714729 #>>43714760 #>>43714766 #>>43714781 #>>43714825 #>>43714839 #>>43714844 #>>43714975 #>>43714991 #>>43715000 #>>43715063 #>>43715072 #>>43715084 #>>43715118 #>>43715227 #>>43715286 #>>43715299 #>>43715350 #>>43716046 #>>43716710 #>>43716759 #>>43717852 #>>43726399 #>>43727782 #
1. mnky9800n ◴[] No.43714608[source]
Most of the sky is left unexplored. I think it’s premature to suggest we don’t see things. There are too many things to see in a single lifetime.
replies(1): >>43714792 #
2. ta8645 ◴[] No.43714792[source]
But if there was a Kardashev type III civilization in the Milky Way, they would have had full control of our entire galaxy in a mere 200 million years or so. And we can be pretty sure that such a civilization doesn't actually exist. Which suggests that either advanced life is rare, or dies off long before it ever reaches such technological breadth.
replies(3): >>43714977 #>>43715038 #>>43715918 #
3. oezi ◴[] No.43714977[source]
Considering the distances between stars, we might not see civilization spreading as coherent empires but more like humans spreading through the islands of the pacific archipelago. Certainly the same species but also culturally seperated to develop on their own.

Unless faster than light travel or communication becomes avaliable, it might not even make sense to travel through the galaxy.

4. simiones ◴[] No.43715038[source]
Or this is merely sci-fi and it's physically impossible to build anything even close to such structures as Dyson spheres. There is no reason whatsoever to believe that just because we can conceive of something like that, it's actually possible to build it using real materials in real quantities with real amounts of available energy in a star system, and even less so to maintain these magical devices even if built.
replies(1): >>43733408 #
5. mnky9800n ◴[] No.43715918[source]
Maybe they have different motivations than humans because they are aliens.
6. jayGlow ◴[] No.43733408{3}[source]
you don't need to build a physical shell, a dyson swarm would get the job done.