←back to thread

514 points mfiguiere | 2 comments | | HN request time: 1.872s | source
Show context
cube2222 ◴[] No.43709576[source]
Fingers crossed for this to work well! Claude Code is pretty excellent.

I’m actually legitimately surprised how good it is, since other coding agents I’ve used before have mostly been a letdown, which made me only use Claude in direct change prompting with Zed (“implement xyz here”, “rewrite this function with abc”, etc), so very hands-on.

So I’ve went into trying out Claude Code rather pessimistically, and now I’m using it all the time! Sure, it ends up costing a bunch, but it’s easy to justify $15 for a prompting session if the end result is a mostly complete PR, done much faster.

All that is to say - competition is good, fingers crossed for codex!

replies(5): >>43709602 #>>43709674 #>>43710104 #>>43710373 #>>43711662 #
therealmarv ◴[] No.43710104[source]
Claude Code has a closed license https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/blob/main/LICENSE....

There is fork named Anon Kode https://github.com/dnakov/anon-kode which can use more models and non-Anthropic ones. But the license is unclear for it.

It's interesting to see codex to be Apache License. Maybe somebody extends it to be usable with competing models.

replies(2): >>43710151 #>>43711621 #
1. WatchDog ◴[] No.43711621[source]
If it's a fork of the proprietary code, the license is pretty clear, it's violating copyright.

Now whether or not anthropic care enough to enforce their license is separate issue, but it seems unwise to make much of an investment in it.

replies(1): >>43711788 #
2. acheong08 ◴[] No.43711788[source]
They call it a "fork" but it doesn't share any code. It's from scratch afaik