←back to thread

514 points mfiguiere | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
cube2222 ◴[] No.43709576[source]
Fingers crossed for this to work well! Claude Code is pretty excellent.

I’m actually legitimately surprised how good it is, since other coding agents I’ve used before have mostly been a letdown, which made me only use Claude in direct change prompting with Zed (“implement xyz here”, “rewrite this function with abc”, etc), so very hands-on.

So I’ve went into trying out Claude Code rather pessimistically, and now I’m using it all the time! Sure, it ends up costing a bunch, but it’s easy to justify $15 for a prompting session if the end result is a mostly complete PR, done much faster.

All that is to say - competition is good, fingers crossed for codex!

replies(5): >>43709602 #>>43709674 #>>43710104 #>>43710373 #>>43711662 #
retinaros ◴[] No.43709674[source]
too expensive. I cant understand why everyone is into claude code vs using claude in cursor or windsurf.
replies(7): >>43709708 #>>43709726 #>>43709771 #>>43710062 #>>43710067 #>>43710341 #>>43711006 #
danenania ◴[] No.43709708[source]
I think it depends a lot on how you value your time. I'm personally willing to spend hundreds or thousands per month happily if it saves me enough hours. I'd estimate that if I were to do consulting, I'd likely be charging in the $150-250 per hour range, so by my math, it's pretty easy to justify any tools that save me even a few hours per month.
replies(6): >>43709732 #>>43709746 #>>43709950 #>>43710110 #>>43711163 #>>43713273 #
1. SoftTalker ◴[] No.43710110[source]
Are you still working 40 hours a week? If so, what's the difference?
replies(2): >>43710461 #>>43710938 #
2. kadushka ◴[] No.43710461[source]
I don’t - if I can use a tool that saves me 10 hours a week, that’s 10 hours more beach time for me.
3. greymalik ◴[] No.43710938[source]
Accomplishing more in that 40 hours?
replies(1): >>43712728 #
4. SoftTalker ◴[] No.43712728[source]
And being paid more? Most salaried employees would not be.