←back to thread

514 points mfiguiere | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
cube2222 ◴[] No.43709576[source]
Fingers crossed for this to work well! Claude Code is pretty excellent.

I’m actually legitimately surprised how good it is, since other coding agents I’ve used before have mostly been a letdown, which made me only use Claude in direct change prompting with Zed (“implement xyz here”, “rewrite this function with abc”, etc), so very hands-on.

So I’ve went into trying out Claude Code rather pessimistically, and now I’m using it all the time! Sure, it ends up costing a bunch, but it’s easy to justify $15 for a prompting session if the end result is a mostly complete PR, done much faster.

All that is to say - competition is good, fingers crossed for codex!

replies(5): >>43709602 #>>43709674 #>>43710104 #>>43710373 #>>43711662 #
retinaros ◴[] No.43709674[source]
too expensive. I cant understand why everyone is into claude code vs using claude in cursor or windsurf.
replies(7): >>43709708 #>>43709726 #>>43709771 #>>43710062 #>>43710067 #>>43710341 #>>43711006 #
danenania ◴[] No.43709708[source]
I think it depends a lot on how you value your time. I'm personally willing to spend hundreds or thousands per month happily if it saves me enough hours. I'd estimate that if I were to do consulting, I'd likely be charging in the $150-250 per hour range, so by my math, it's pretty easy to justify any tools that save me even a few hours per month.
replies(6): >>43709732 #>>43709746 #>>43709950 #>>43710110 #>>43711163 #>>43713273 #
retinaros ◴[] No.43709746[source]
ok but in what way a terminal is a bettter UI than an IDE? I am trying all of them on a weekly basis and windsurf UX seems miles ahead/ more efficient than a terminal. that is also what OAI believes or else they wouldnt try to buy it
replies(4): >>43709828 #>>43709910 #>>43709973 #>>43710127 #
1. ChadMoran ◴[] No.43709828{3}[source]
Not a better UI at all but seems like they're able to then focus on what matters in these early stages and that's quality of output.