←back to thread

842 points putzdown | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.439s | source
Show context
asdajksah2123 ◴[] No.43693223[source]
America does need to bring back manufacturing. Not because a manufacturing job that pays $25/hr is somehow better than a service job that pays $25/hr.

The US needs to bring back manufacturing for strategic reasons and in strategic areas.

And it needs to have the capability to scale up manufacturing in response to emergencies.

But also, importantly, the US doesn't need to do this by onshoring all manufacturing. Near shoring and friend shoring will have to be extremely important components of adding these capabilities, and unfortunately, teh actions the US is taking will likely hurt nearshoring and friendshoring and will end up making the US less strategically capable in manufacturing even if it's able to reshore a significant amount of manufacturing.

replies(5): >>43693268 #>>43693315 #>>43693494 #>>43693626 #>>43708779 #
1. howmayiannoyyou ◴[] No.43693494[source]
The components of a strategic manufactured product can be as simple as an injection molded switch, a LiION battery, capacitors, copper wire, etc., so the notion of bringing only "strategic items" back is as much a myth as the idea its mostly coming back to the USA. The goal here is to diversify the supply chain globally so its not concentrated in China. Internally this is sold as bringing MFG back to the USA (will happen to a noticeable degree), but that's not the actual plan.
replies(1): >>43695628 #
2. ta1243 ◴[] No.43695628[source]
So putting tarrifs on Mexico, Canada, Europe helps diversify?