←back to thread

842 points putzdown | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
1. throwawaymaths ◴[] No.43692929[source]
Molson has a Chinese spouse, directly benefitted from Chinese manufacturing for a long time, and often spouts direct propaganda from his X account so while he's likely to be right about a lot of things he had/has a strong incentive to not imagine alternatives to the status quo.
replies(1): >>43693050 #
2. cbg0 ◴[] No.43693050[source]
Try attacking the points he made in the article instead of him.
replies(2): >>43693413 #>>43693537 #
3. throwawaymaths ◴[] No.43693413[source]
What attacks? Fwiw: "he's likely to be right about a lot of things". Perhaps I should have been more specific: I think his analyses are mostly correct, his predictions are not.

Subscribe to ground news so that you know what historically a news sources biases are.

replies(1): >>43693677 #
4. pcdoodle ◴[] No.43693537[source]
I don't really see what he said as an attack. It's good to have some "small print" sprinkles with the meal.
5. throwawaymaths ◴[] No.43693677{3}[source]
For example: "you can't imagine the cheap Chinese robots coming online"... Then what's stopping an American manufacturer from buying a Chinese robot, taking the tariff hit once, then manufacturing domestically with no tariff?