←back to thread

68 points bitbasher | 6 comments | | HN request time: 0.416s | source | bottom
Show context
dale_glass ◴[] No.43690488[source]
I don't believe there's any major harm in using Github for most projects.

Maintaining my own servers and chasing ideological purity doesn't improve my project. Any time I dedicate to setting up infrastructure is time I'm not dedicating to making the code better.

The nature of Git means Microsoft can't really do much harm. Every developer and contributor has a copy of the repo, should the worst happen setting up home elsewhere isn't that difficult. But until it is, why spend time on it?

replies(5): >>43690518 #>>43690608 #>>43690688 #>>43690718 #>>43691471 #
bestouff ◴[] No.43690518[source]
> The nature of Git means Microsoft can't really do much harm.

Famous last words

replies(2): >>43690769 #>>43690948 #
1. Zambyte ◴[] No.43690769[source]
Especially when a huge portion of GitHub is not Git (wiki, discussions, issues, ci...)
replies(2): >>43691844 #>>43704078 #
2. qiine ◴[] No.43691844[source]
at this point it feels like github is becoming a social network for developers
replies(1): >>43692142 #
3. bitbasher ◴[] No.43692142[source]
Give it a few more years and we'll have LinkedIn-like developer feeds.
replies(1): >>43699092 #
4. qiine ◴[] No.43699092{3}[source]
Why do you give away nightmarish ideas for free ?
5. queenkjuul ◴[] No.43704078[source]
The wikis are backed by git repos, i just moved my project wiki from GitHub to self-hosted, took just minutes

Issues and PR comments are another story though

replies(1): >>43726455 #
6. rurban ◴[] No.43726455[source]
Issues and PR are covered in git-bug bridges, easily mirrored to other forges. But since all other forges still suck compared to github, everybody uses github.