←back to thread

Meta antitrust trial kicks off in federal court

(www.axios.com)
431 points c420 | 8 comments | 14 Apr 25 13:18 UTC | HN request time: 1.064s | source | bottom
Show context
karhuton ◴[15 Apr 25 05:42 UTC] No.43689325[source]▶
As someone who’s stuck with Whatsapp and no way out (friends and family won’t switch), I dearly hope for a split.

I do struggle to understand how we here casually lump tohether totally different platforms as comptetitors.

It’s not like I can use Youtube or Tiktok instead of Whatsapp with my family for direct and group discussion. Even X and Instagram would be a stretch, as their raison d’être is public social media and not instant messaging.

Sure the platforms have overlapping features, but you ain’t gonna use a knife insted of a spoon.

replies(6): >>43689436 #>>43690077 #>>43690383 #>>43690591 #>>43690814 #>>43696002 #
1. fransje26 ◴[15 Apr 25 09:10 UTC] No.43690591[source]▶
> It’s not like I can use Youtube or Tiktok instead of Whatsapp with my family for direct and group discussion.

What's wrong with Signal? Or, worst-case scenario, Telegram?

replies(3): >>43691237 #>>43692190 #>>43692864 #
2. emblaegh ◴[15 Apr 25 11:10 UTC] No.43691237[source]▶
It’s hard to overstate the pervasiveness of WhatsApp in some some countries. Where I’m from work, service hiring, costumer service, etc are all conducted through (and specially for small businesses only though) WhatsApp.
replies(1): >>43703392 #
3. Gasp0de ◴[15 Apr 25 13:12 UTC] No.43692190[source]▶
What's the use case for using Telegram over Whatsapp? At least the latter has proper end-to-end encryption of content?
replies(1): >>43695046 #
4. _fat_santa ◴[15 Apr 25 14:04 UTC] No.43692864[source]▶
> What's wrong with Signal? Or, worst-case scenario, Telegram?

IMO from a technical perspective nothing but more of how do you get your entire network to migrate from one chat app to another. Everyone here says just get your parents, siblings, friends to switch but it's far more complicated than that.

My wife is from Brazil and uses WA all the time. Getting her to switch would mean getting her entire network of family and friends to switch and you would have to make that pitch to everyone in the "network". All of a sudden it goes from getting a few people to switch to getting literally thousands to switch which is next to impossible.

replies(2): >>43694507 #>>43701321 #
5. rpgbr ◴[15 Apr 25 15:46 UTC] No.43694507[source]▶
Plus, all carriers in Brazil exempts WhatsApp from data caps (zero-rating). They are working on remove other apps from zero-rating, but WhatsApp is harder to since it's synonymous to “messages” here and alternatives are expensive (SMS) or not as near widespread (Telegram is a far runner-up mostly used for its semi-public, huge groups).
6. fsflover ◴[15 Apr 25 16:20 UTC] No.43695046[source]▶
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43563574

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43562320

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32950204

7. DrFalkyn ◴[16 Apr 25 04:04 UTC] No.43701321[source]▶
Is there some law that you can only use a single messaging app ?
8. fransje26 ◴[16 Apr 25 09:46 UTC] No.43703392[source]▶
That's very true, in the same way that some countries seem to prefer using Facebook as "websites" for small businesses.

But this doesn't stop people from migrating their private interactions away from WhatsApp/Meta, by using using -as an example- Signal as their replacement app of choice where they can. The frictional cost of keeping WhatsApp for business interaction, and Signal for private interaction is fairly close to zero.