←back to thread

Show HN: I made a free tool that analyzes SEC filings and posts detailed reports

(www.signalbloom.ai)
289 points GodelNumbering | 1 comments | 13 Apr 25 19:33 UTC | HN request time: 0.199s | source

(* within a few minutes of SEC filing)

Currently does it for 1000+ US companies and specifically earnings related filings. By US companies, I mean the ones that are obliged to file SEC filings.

This was the result of almost a year long effort and hundreds of prototypes :)

It currently auto-publishes for 1000 ish US companies by market cap, relies on 8-K filing as a trigger.

e.g. https://www.signalbloom.ai/news/NVDA will take you to NVDA earnings

Would be grateful to get some feedback. Especially if you follow a company, check its reports out. Thank you!

Some examples: https://www.signalbloom.ai/news/AAPL/apple-q1-eps-beats-desp...

https://www.signalbloom.ai/news/NVDA/nvidia-revenue-soars-ma...

https://www.signalbloom.ai/news/JPM/jpm-beats-estimates-on-c... (JPM earnings from Friday)

Hallucination note: https://www.signalbloom.ai/hallucination-benchmark

Show context
dchuk ◴[14 Apr 25 03:36 UTC] No.43677842[source]▶
Well done site. One important nit pick: never use charts that don’t start from 0 on the y axis. I was looking at a stock that had a yoy growth rate reduction of 6% (from 39 to 33 for each respective yoy period), and the chart showed an aggressive down to the right trend line because the y axis started at 33% instead of 0%.

Charts like that show more detail sure, but everyone freaks out in reaction to them. Always zero out your graphs.

replies(4): >>43677904 #>>43678302 #>>43678894 #>>43679552 #
WheatMillington ◴[14 Apr 25 03:51 UTC] No.43677904[source]▶
I disagree with this. Zero is an arbitrary and often useless intersection. A stock worth $300 is going to show meaningless movements at that scale.
replies(5): >>43677936 #>>43677937 #>>43677993 #>>43678099 #>>43680973 #
bufferoverflow ◴[14 Apr 25 13:21 UTC] No.43680973[source]▶
Zero is not arbitrary when it comes to the stock price.
replies(1): >>43690493 #
1. Etheryte ◴[15 Apr 25 08:54 UTC] No.43690493[source]▶
It very much is, because stocks don't start at zero and your entry point will also not be zero. You can be deep in the red long before the stock gets anywhere close to zero. Even when a stock hits zero it doesn't always mean something useful, look at the Hertz bankruptcy for a good example. As far as stocks are concerned, zero is arbitrary and pretty universally a useless reference point.