←back to thread

218 points signa11 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.229s | source
Show context
pjmlp ◴[] No.43681194[source]
> The reason I believe C is and always will be important is that it stands in a class of its own as a mostly portable assembler language, offering similar levels of freedom.

When your computer is a PDP-11, otherwise it is a high level systems language like any other.

replies(7): >>43682173 #>>43682246 #>>43682554 #>>43682928 #>>43683332 #>>43683914 #>>43701871 #
NoTeslaThrow ◴[] No.43682554[source]
> When your computer is a PDP-11, otherwise it is a high level systems language like any other.

Describing C as "high-level" seems like deliberate abuse of the term. The virtual machine abstraction doesn't imply any benefits to the developer.

replies(4): >>43682932 #>>43682952 #>>43683254 #>>43701753 #
1. ecb_penguin ◴[] No.43683254[source]
> Describing C as "high-level" seems like deliberate abuse of the term

Honestly it doesn't really matter. High level and low level are relative to each-other (and machine language), and nothing changes based on what label you use.

Best thing to do is shrug and say "ok".