←back to thread

Googler... ex-Googler

(nerdy.dev)
1114 points namukang | 1 comments | 11 Apr 25 20:19 UTC | HN request time: 0.378s | source
Show context
lapcat ◴[14 Apr 25 10:02 UTC] No.43679693[source]▶
This article was actually posted 3 days ago. I saw it back then and read the comments. You can see the old timestamp here: https://hn.algolia.com/?q=https%3A%2F%2Fnerdy.dev%2Fex-googl...

I think this is what HN calls the "second chance pool".

I absolutely hate when HN reposts an article and alters/falsifies the timestamps. It's so incredibly misleading.

replies(1): >>43679928 #
1. B1FF_PSUVM ◴[14 Apr 25 10:50 UTC] No.43679928[source]▶
In other occasions, time seems to pass very slowly for the aging of first-page items. Probably relativistic effects of large amounts of hidden mass ...