←back to thread

I bought a Mac

(loganius.org)
237 points todsacerdoti | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.414s | source
Show context
SpecialistK ◴[] No.43677433[source]
The late PowerPC-era Macs are really fun to play with, because they're an interesting blend of modern niceties like USB and Ethernet but are limited with how old most software is. There's still a scene of people working on bringing newer versions of GCC and other *nix utilities to Tiger or Leopard, working with the pre-release PPC betas of Snow Leopard, and trying to keep online services working despite aging TLS versions and retired APIs. Compiling takes forever until it fails with an obscure C11 error or missing C library features. And that makes for a fun, if often frustrating, challenge.

But PPC32 Linux support is quickly falling off. Gentoo isn't just used because it's fun to leave your lampshade iMac G4 compiling a kernel for days, but because it's one of the few distros still supporting the platform. There's unsupported testing repos for Debian (and maybe Ubuntu?) plus the up-and-coming Adelie. Otherwise your best bet is OpenBSD - FreeBSD and NetBSD usually lack precompiled ports, and FreeBSD has announced the next major release will almost definitely drop 32 bit PPC.

The 64 bit G5 systems are much better supporte. I'm pretty sure they can boot ppc64le that many distros target. They're also even more modern - the final models had PCIe, SATA, and up to 16GB of DDR2 RAM. Sadly there's nothing modern about the power efficiency, nor the self-destructing water cooling system.

replies(11): >>43677491 #>>43677500 #>>43677524 #>>43677545 #>>43677606 #>>43677681 #>>43678193 #>>43678321 #>>43679399 #>>43688319 #>>43709006 #
genevra ◴[] No.43677500[source]
It's always bothered me that Apple has so little backwards compatibility. I suppose that's why Windows is used by most of the corporate world for "reliability" (more reliable than Apple), and "ease of use" (people don't want to learn command line for Linux). It's just the mid option
replies(9): >>43677544 #>>43677566 #>>43677619 #>>43679159 #>>43679908 #>>43680012 #>>43680137 #>>43682223 #>>43686116 #
chongli ◴[] No.43677566[source]
Apple's built their entire company on dropping backwards compatibility. It's how they've maintained their agility for so long, despite being one of the largest companies on the planet.
replies(7): >>43677579 #>>43677616 #>>43677623 #>>43678570 #>>43680517 #>>43680828 #>>43690694 #
rickdeckard ◴[] No.43678570[source]
Alas they didn't become one of the largest companies on the planet because of how they treated their macOS userbase.

Especially nowadays it seems their biggest asset became that they produce good PC-hardware on such a high economics of scale that they're almost unreachable in build-quality...

replies(1): >>43679537 #
1. lostlogin ◴[] No.43679537[source]
> Alas they didn't become one of the largest companies on the planet because of how they treated their macOS userbase.

I’m not so sure. We love to complain about Apple, but I don’t see many old timer Mac users now extolling the virtues of Windows. It’s dangerous extrapolating one’s own observations to the world at large, so maybe I’m wrong?

replies(1): >>43679663 #
2. rickdeckard ◴[] No.43679663[source]
> We love to complain about Apple, but I don’t see many old timer Mac users now extolling the virtues of Windows.

This might be true, but macOS in general is not what made Apple one of the largest companies on the planet.

That's not about complaining, it's about correlation and causation. It's like saying Apple's Wi-Fi routers must be the best because Apple became one of the largest companies on the planet.

I'd say without the iOS ecosystem they would be a well-respected company in the premium tier of their industry, like Dyson or B&O.