←back to thread

Show HN: I made a free tool that analyzes SEC filings and posts detailed reports

(www.signalbloom.ai)
289 points GodelNumbering | 2 comments | 13 Apr 25 19:33 UTC | HN request time: 0.558s | source

(* within a few minutes of SEC filing)

Currently does it for 1000+ US companies and specifically earnings related filings. By US companies, I mean the ones that are obliged to file SEC filings.

This was the result of almost a year long effort and hundreds of prototypes :)

It currently auto-publishes for 1000 ish US companies by market cap, relies on 8-K filing as a trigger.

e.g. https://www.signalbloom.ai/news/NVDA will take you to NVDA earnings

Would be grateful to get some feedback. Especially if you follow a company, check its reports out. Thank you!

Some examples: https://www.signalbloom.ai/news/AAPL/apple-q1-eps-beats-desp...

https://www.signalbloom.ai/news/NVDA/nvidia-revenue-soars-ma...

https://www.signalbloom.ai/news/JPM/jpm-beats-estimates-on-c... (JPM earnings from Friday)

Hallucination note: https://www.signalbloom.ai/hallucination-benchmark

Show context
dchuk ◴[14 Apr 25 03:36 UTC] No.43677842[source]▶
Well done site. One important nit pick: never use charts that don’t start from 0 on the y axis. I was looking at a stock that had a yoy growth rate reduction of 6% (from 39 to 33 for each respective yoy period), and the chart showed an aggressive down to the right trend line because the y axis started at 33% instead of 0%.

Charts like that show more detail sure, but everyone freaks out in reaction to them. Always zero out your graphs.

replies(4): >>43677904 #>>43678302 #>>43678894 #>>43679552 #
WheatMillington ◴[14 Apr 25 03:51 UTC] No.43677904[source]▶
I disagree with this. Zero is an arbitrary and often useless intersection. A stock worth $300 is going to show meaningless movements at that scale.
replies(5): >>43677936 #>>43677937 #>>43677993 #>>43678099 #>>43680973 #
dchuk ◴[14 Apr 25 04:14 UTC] No.43677993[source]▶
That’s the exact point?
replies(1): >>43678004 #
WheatMillington ◴[14 Apr 25 04:16 UTC] No.43678004[source]▶
No, it isn't. People are interested in whether a stock has volatility, and whether it has moved x%. If a $10 stock loses $1 it should show a roughly matching pattern to a $200 stock losing $20. Intersecting at zero will show a very large movement for the $10 stock and a very small movement in the $200 stock, despite the effect being the same to stockholders.
replies(1): >>43678276 #
1. degamad ◴[14 Apr 25 05:13 UTC] No.43678276[source]▶
> Intersecting at zero will show a very large movement for the $10 stock and a very small movement in the $200 stock...

How so? Surely both will show a 10% movement?

replies(1): >>43678455 #
2. ◴[14 Apr 25 05:56 UTC] No.43678455[source]▶